|
|
|
 |
National Science
Foundation Award #0520055 |
 |
 |
 |
Collaborative Research: Examining the Relationship between Identity, Injustice, and Emotion |
| |
| Investigator(s): |
Lynn Smith-Lovin (PI)
|
| Sponsor: |
Duke University, NC 27708 9196843030
|
| Start Date/Expiration Date |
2005-09-15 to 2007-08-31 (amended 2005-09-19) |
| Awarded Amount to Date: |
$66,682 |
| Abstract: Collaborative Research
SES- 0519969
Dawn Robinson
Jody Clay-Robinson
University of Georgia
SES- 0520055
Lynn Smith-Lovin
Duke University
Scholars widely agree that under-reward makes people feel negative emotions like depression and anger. But two major sociological theories of identity- affect control theory and identity control theory- make diametrically opposing predictions about how people respond to over-reward. This project will examine two main questions: (1) How do people feel when they are treated better than they feel they deserve? (2) What is the relationship between feeling and action in these situations of over-reward? The PIs will use innovative physiological measures to resolve this theoretical controversy in the sociological literature. This research will offer a new understanding of the relationship between identity, injustice, and emotion, while developing new measurement techniques to better distinguish the theoretical constructs of emotion and identity disconfirmation. The researchers hypothesize that emotional response to injustice is more related to identity than to justice itself. It is only when one thinks that one is being a bad person by being over-rewarded- getting ahead at someone else's expense and with their knowledge- that over-reward makes one feel bad. Over-reward will lead to negative emotion only when it creates a negative identity. Otherwise, the experience of receiving more than one deserves will disconfirm the pre-existing identity in a positive direction, and produce positive emotion. An interesting, counter-intuitive prediction of affect control theory is that even though over-rewarded participants will feel good, they will act to reduce the over-reward in future rounds of the experiments.
Broader Impacts: The research has broader implications for work settings, political policy discussions and for understanding social movement. They will specify the conditions that lead to behavioral remedy for injustice, and the occasions in which other mechanisms are likely to be available for resolving any stress that results from over-reward. Since those who are under-rewarded are often not well positioned to help themselves gain more resources, the reactions of the over-rewarded are key to addressing many forms of injustice. |
|
| NSF Org: |
SES - Division of Social and Economic Sciences |
| Award Number: |
0520055 |
| Award Instrument: |
Standard Grant |
| Program Manager: |
Patricia White
SES Division of Social and Economic Sciences
SBE Directorate for Social, Behavioral & Economic Sciences
|
| NSF Program(s): |
SOCIOLOGY |
| Field Application(s): |
Human Subjects |
| Program Reference Code(s): |
UNASSIGNED, 0000 |
| Program Element Code(s): |
1331 |
|
|
| |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|